<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Securing the Realm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securingtherealm.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securingtherealm.com</link>
	<description>UK Government Cyber Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Incident Response Security Cheat Sheets by Phk</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2011/05/20/incident-response-security-cheat-sheets/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=633#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s just great.
And they have a lot more in the Website, under &quot;IRM&quot;

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just great.<br />
And they have a lot more in the Website, under &#8220;IRM&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Certified Product Specialist &#8211; ePO by Stuart Davis</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2011/01/20/mcafee-certified-product-specialist-epo/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=547#comment-180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, i just took the exam their and while some of the questions could have been worded better - it was well rounded in terms of questions &amp; relevancy.

My tip - take the onsite or classroom training from McAfee and then do exam - it&#039;ll be a snap

Stuart]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, i just took the exam their and while some of the questions could have been worded better &#8211; it was well rounded in terms of questions &amp; relevancy.</p>
<p>My tip &#8211; take the onsite or classroom training from McAfee and then do exam &#8211; it&#8217;ll be a snap</p>
<p>Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee False Positive in DAT 6329 by Andy</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2011/04/28/mcafee-false-positive-in-dat-6329/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=620#comment-153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAT 6330 has now been released which fixes this isue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAT 6330 has now been released which fixes this isue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee False Positive in DAT 6329 by Andy</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2011/04/28/mcafee-false-positive-in-dat-6329/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=620#comment-152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further information is now available in the KB link including a SDAT and an MSI of the SDAT Installer for use via AD deployment.

KB = https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&amp;id=KB71739]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further information is now available in the KB link including a SDAT and an MSI of the SDAT Installer for use via AD deployment.</p>
<p>KB = <a href="https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&#038;id=KB71739" rel="nofollow">https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&#038;id=KB71739</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Certified Product Specialist &#8211; ePO by Andy</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2011/01/20/mcafee-certified-product-specialist-epo/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=547#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eddy

I used a mix of experience (I have worked with McAfee ePO daily for 2 years) and downloaded the McAfee ePO install PDF and product guide PDF and worked through them making notes on minimum system specs etc. You need to know the console inside and out and have used each component.

I notice they now have a blueprint which also has some test questions, I suggest following this and having a go at the test questions.

Good luck with your exam, let me know how you get on!

Regards

Andy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eddy</p>
<p>I used a mix of experience (I have worked with McAfee ePO daily for 2 years) and downloaded the McAfee ePO install PDF and product guide PDF and worked through them making notes on minimum system specs etc. You need to know the console inside and out and have used each component.</p>
<p>I notice they now have a blueprint which also has some test questions, I suggest following this and having a go at the test questions.</p>
<p>Good luck with your exam, let me know how you get on!</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Certified Product Specialist &#8211; ePO by Eddy</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2011/01/20/mcafee-certified-product-specialist-epo/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=547#comment-141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi

did you use any study material for exam or the work experience was enough ?

because i am planning to take it too

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>did you use any study material for exam or the work experience was enough ?</p>
<p>because i am planning to take it too</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Launches Security Certification Program by Andy</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2011/01/17/mcafee-launches-security-certification-program/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=487#comment-126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I&#039;ve booked my exam for the ePO Product Specialist for this Thursday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve booked my exam for the ePO Product Specialist for this Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Password Strength by MobyChien</title>
		<link>http://securingtherealm.com/2010/10/24/password-strength/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MobyChien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrazypenguin.com/?p=417#comment-94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article on password security is very misleading... Lots have been written on password or pass phrase security and IMHO, password is just not secure no matter how complex it is.  The  time it took to crack a password is very debatable and thus very misleading.  For example, if Rainbow table is used (in case of Microsoft LM hash), I could crack your password no matter how complex it is as long as it is less than 15 character long in about less than an hour!  So if the risk level is high (e.g. on-line banking), use two-factor authentication if it is possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article on password security is very misleading&#8230; Lots have been written on password or pass phrase security and IMHO, password is just not secure no matter how complex it is.  The  time it took to crack a password is very debatable and thus very misleading.  For example, if Rainbow table is used (in case of Microsoft LM hash), I could crack your password no matter how complex it is as long as it is less than 15 character long in about less than an hour!  So if the risk level is high (e.g. on-line banking), use two-factor authentication if it is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

